<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Art, Science, and Engineering of Fuzzing: A Survey · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.00140/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.00140/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Art, Science, and Engineering of Fuzzing: A Survey — mentioned by nickpsecurity</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39565922</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1812.00140:39565922</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 19:41:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here’s a survey of fuzzing techniques: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.00140.pdf One of the earliest examples was a person who fuzzed many applications by getting them to load files he created. His files triggered many vulnerabilities in apps. His method (IIRC): take a file, flip a bit, load it, repeat throughout the file. Amazing how effective it was.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.00140/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>The Art, Science, and Engineering of Fuzzing: A Survey — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22062564</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1812.00140:22062564</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2020 08:15:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The Art, Science, and Engineering of Fuzzing: A Survey (2018)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.00140/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>The Art, Science, and Engineering of Fuzzing: A Survey — mentioned by matt_d</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20830846</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1812.00140:20830846</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 16:15:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Generating Software Tests&amp;quot; (https://www.fuzzingbook.org/) is pretty great (independent of your programming language) - arguably a must read for anyone interested in software testing. John Regehr (the author of the blog post) has written more great posts: - How to Fuzz an ADT Implementation - https://blog.regehr.org/archives/896 - Better Random Testing by Leaving Features Out - https://blog.regehr.org/archives/591 - Tricking a Whitebox Testcase Generator - https://blog.regehr.org/archives/672 - Fuzzers Need Taming - https://blog.regehr.org/archives/925 - Levels of Fuzzing…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.00140/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
