<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Strike (with) a Pose: Neural Networks Are Easily Fooled by Strange Poses of Familiar Objects · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.11553/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.11553/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Strike (with) a Pose: Neural Networks Are Easily Fooled by Strange Poses of Familiar Objects — mentioned by mindgam3</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18766657</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1811.11553:18766657</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:01:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it just my sonar beeping off the charts, or does anyone else hear the unmistakable signs of a submarine article? (1) Apologies in advance for what may be perceived as a rant. I have a very low tolerance for clickbait-y BS like this as it pertains to my own passions as a lifelong chess devotee and former professional player. First, the author of the article has no professional credibility in either chess or machine learning. He&amp;#x27;s a professor of math and a writer. No disrespect to either math or writing, I love and value both very highly, but they have very little to do with chess and…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.11553/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
