<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hardware · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.11184/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.11184/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hardware — mentioned by infinitewalk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18695534</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1811.11184:18695534</guid><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2018 22:01:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m one of the developers on PennyLane, a cross-platform Python library for quantum machine learning (QML), automatic differentiation, and optimization of hybrid quantum-classical computations. For a while now, QML has been getting a lot of hype --- at the Quantum2Business conference the other day, a quote that made the rounds was &amp;quot;QML: most overhyped and underestimated field at the same time&amp;quot; (attributed to Iordanis Kerenidis, I believe). However, current research has been showing a lot of promise, especially as an application for near-term quantum devices, that doesn&amp;#x27;t require an…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.11184/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
