HackerPapers

arXiv:1811.10154stat.ML

Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead

Cynthia Rudin

Abstract

Black box machine learning models are currently being used for high stakes decision-making throughout society, causing problems throughout healthcare, criminal justice, and in other domains. People have hoped that creating methods for explaining these black box models will alleviate some of these problems, but trying to \textit{explain} black box models, rather than creating models that are \textit{interpretable} in the first place, is likely to perpetuate bad practices and can potentially cause catastrophic harm to society. There is a way forward -- it is to design models that are inherently interpretable. This manuscript clarifies the chasm between explaining black boxes and using inherently interpretable models, outlines several key reasons why explainable black boxes should be avoided in high-stakes decisions, identifies challenges to interpretable machine learning, and provides several example applications where interpretable models could potentially replace black box models in criminal justice, healthcare, and computer vision.

arXiv comments
Author's pre-publication version of a 2019 Nature Machine Intelligence article. Shorter Version was published in NIPS 2018 Workshop on Critiquing and Correcting Trends in Machine Learning. Expands also on NSF Statistics at a Crossroads Webinar
Journal reference
Nature Machine Intelligence, Vol 1, May 2019, 206-215
DOI
Subjects
stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics) cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 7 identifiable commenters in 7 comments across 5 threads, from Nov 2019 to Apr 2024. Found in 2 HN submissions from Oct 2019 to Feb 2020. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments5 threads

    • Looking at this from a machine learning perspective, the risk of biases is even higher in these cases because of issues with data drift (Members could change sites, they could start dressing differently, etc.) and imbalances in the dataset (A lot fewer Hamams members than…

      koutetsuView on HNParent context

    • Yeah, currently I do things like "Top 5 important factors" for shapely values, but have debated on even doing that much. There is good evidence these reduced form estimates can often be misleading, https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.10154. So it may just be a hopeless task anyway.

      apwheeleView on HNParent context

    • Cynthia has a great paper where she distinguishes between "interpretable" and "explainable" https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.10154.pdf

      qPM9l3XJrFView on HNParent context

    • Her most cited paper is https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.10154 and it references a lot of her other work. It provides a good representation of what she does and what she is well known for.

      walnut_eaterView on HNParent context

    • From the linked paper, linked again [0] below, I think this represents Rudins philosophical view, and why it could be practical: Here is the Rashomon set argument: Consider that the data permit a large set of reasonably accurate predictive models to exist. Because this set of…

      pjmorrisView on HNParent context

  1. Ode to J 1 comment
    • I think someone has translated this to J, but I am trying on my own to practice my J-fu by implementing it in my own way. Then I usually open it up to the J experts on the mailing list, and my learning takes off. There are some awesomely smart people there who are generous with…

      eggyView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.