<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Six Strange Facts About`Oumuamua · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.08832/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.08832/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Six Strange Facts About`Oumuamua — mentioned by stametseater</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35235413</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1811.08832:35235413</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 17:38:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I haven&amp;#x27;t read that book yet, but if I understand correctly his reasoning for the &amp;quot;space buoy&amp;quot; hypothesis is that Oumuamua&amp;#x27;s velocity was quite close to the Local Standard of Rest. Is that accurate? At least, that&amp;#x27;s the reasoning he claims in his &amp;quot;Six Strange Facts About`Oumuamua&amp;quot; article: https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.08832 In his book, does he address the counterargument (https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.01910) that such a velocity is entirely in line with expected parameters, being within the predicted distribution of values for intestellar objects detected by asteroid surveys, which was published…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.08832/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.pop-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
