arXiv:1811.08489cs.CV
Balanced Datasets Are Not Enough: Estimating and Mitigating Gender Bias in Deep Image Representations
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
In this work, we present a framework to measure and mitigate intrinsic biases with respect to protected variables --such as gender-- in visual recognition tasks. We show that trained models significantly amplify the association of target labels with gender beyond what one would expect from biased datasets. Surprisingly, we show that even when datasets are balanced such that each label co-occurs equally with each gender, learned models amplify the association between labels and gender, as much as if data had not been balanced! To mitigate this, we adopt an adversarial approach to remove unwanted features corresponding to protected variables from intermediate representations in a deep neural network -- and provide a detailed analysis of its effectiveness. Experiments on two datasets: the COCO dataset (objects), and the imSitu dataset (actions), show reductions in gender bias amplification while maintaining most of the accuracy of the original models.
What a terrible take. Stefan Baack is definitely not an ml researcher and I can't imagine any read over this piece. > Common Crawl’s mission as an organization does not easily align with the needs of trustworthy AI development. Its guiding principle is that less curation of the…
light_hue_1View on HNParent context