https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.07005/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19171825urn:hackerpapers:mention:1811.07005:19171825Fri, 15 Feb 2019 15:50:23 GMT<p>Side-channel attacks are some of the most terrifying to me, because fundamentally your code works fine, it&#x27;s just some detail in the timing that gives away information. At least with buffer overflows there are automated ways to try and find them, like fuzz testing. It&#x27;s not perfect, but at least it&#x27;s something to try and validate you are doing the right thing. Is there some sort of fuzz testing that could potentially find side-channel timing attacks? Maybe some sort of statistical analysis on the timing results? I found this https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.07005.pdf but it seems to be fairly…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.07005/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.CR