<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challenge · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.02629/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.02629/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challenge — mentioned by shoo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28824287</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1811.02629:28824287</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2021 03:18:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; All the imaging datasets have been segmented manually, by one to four raters, following the same annotation protocol, and their annotations were approved by experienced board-certified neuro-radiologists. Annotations comprise the GD-enhancing tumor (ET — label 4), the peritumoral edematous/invaded tissue (ED — label 2), and the necrotic tumor core (NCR — label 1), as described both in the BraTS 2012-2013 TMI paper [1] and in the latest BraTS summarizing paper [2]. The ground truth data were created after their pre-processing, i.e., co-registered to the same anatomical template, interpolated…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.02629/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
