<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Open Images Dataset V4: Unified image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection at scale · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.00982/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.00982/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Open Images Dataset V4: Unified image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection at scale — mentioned by tofof</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20512443</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1811.00982:20512443</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 04:51:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Obviously the question of whether an ML model is adequately transformative is an unanswered one, at least as far as I&amp;#x27;m aware, in any jurisdiction. However, in this specific case, I would expect most courts to place heavy weight on the clear, initial massive-scale infringment from the dataset alone to conclude that no good-faith effort (or, apparently, any effort at all) was made to avoid trampling these artists&amp;#x27; rights. Such &amp;#x27;dirty hands&amp;#x27; would potentially discredit any attempt to claim original creative expression, rather than commercialism, motivated the creation of this ML model. This…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.00982/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
