<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Algebraic approach to promise constraint satisfaction · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.00970/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.00970/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Algebraic approach to promise constraint satisfaction — mentioned by cevi</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38568967</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1811.00970:38568967</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2023 13:46:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;At first, the results claimed here seem to clash with the fact that we know, for instance, that it is NP-hard to 5-color a graph which is promised to be 3-colorable [1]. Of course, the devil is in the details - on page 11, where they describe the &amp;quot;LOCAL&amp;quot; computation model they work in, they explain: &amp;quot;In each round the processors may perform unbounded computations on their respective local state variables and subsequently exchange of messages of arbitrary size along the links given by the underlying input graph.&amp;quot; Given this setup, it should be possible to solve any problem in O(n) rounds, and…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1811.00970/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CC</category></item></channel></rss>
