<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Exploiting The Laws of Order in Smart Contracts · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1810.11605/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1810.11605/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Exploiting The Laws of Order in Smart Contracts — mentioned by jkhdigital</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21618544</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1810.11605:21618544</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2019 05:20:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;So glad you asked: 1. https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/748.pdf 2. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.11605.pdf 3. https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/775.pdf 4. https://users.encs.concordia.ca/~clark/papers/2019_wtsc_fron... 5. http://homepages.cs.ncl.ac.uk/patrick.mccorry/minerbribery.p... This one isn&amp;#x27;t an attack per se, it is mostly an exploration of arbitrage bots in decentralized exchanges running on Ethereum smart contracts. However, they point out that miners can trivially capture the value of the arbitrage transactions by front-running, and that this &amp;quot;free money&amp;quot; is like a bonus block subsidy that falls…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1810.11605/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
