https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1810.11563/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18636166urn:hackerpapers:mention:1810.11563:18636166Sat, 08 Dec 2018 17:04:57 GMT<p>&gt; There is no reference to an actual paper in the article Hover over the underlined &quot;proposed a solution&quot; in the first paragraph and see https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.11563 -- although the article certainly doesn&#x27;t go so far as to point to e.g. §23 and the Conclusion, so I at least partly agree with you. I don&#x27;t have much time for AdS arguments, so haven&#x27;t done more than quickly skim for relevance to the Quanta article (which I also just skimmed for much the same reason). &gt; these pop science sensationalist websites I can&#x27;t really agree with characterizing Quanta as either &quot;pop science&quot; or…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1810.11563/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>hep-th