<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Universal Language Model Fine-Tuning with Subword Tokenization for Polish · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1810.10222/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1810.10222/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Universal Language Model Fine-Tuning with Subword Tokenization for Polish — mentioned by mci</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22451924</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1810.10222:22451924</guid><pubDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:03:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The term you are looking for may be &amp;quot;highly inflected&amp;quot;. Side note: IMHO, you are exaggerating the ability of Polish to form long compounds. Dissecting the &amp;quot;Bezbarwne zielone idee wściekle śpią&amp;quot; example from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.10222.pdf#page=3 reveals no words longer than 4 morphemes: bez-BARW-n-e ZIEL-on-e IDE-e WŚCIEK-l-e ŚP-ią, where I put word roots in uppercase and bound morphemes in lowercase. The longest sequences of morphemes (for a loose definition of morpheme) I can think of are conditional mood of verbs with double prefixes like po-wy-CHODZI-ł-y-by-ście. However, the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1810.10222/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Universal Language Model Fine-Tuning with Subword Tokenization for Polish — mentioned by jph00</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22451109</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1810.10222:22451109</guid><pubDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 15:47:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes you&amp;#x27;re right, in our NLP course we used Turkish as our example. But for the book I mentioned Polish due to this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.10222 . But as you say, now the word &amp;quot;agglutinative&amp;quot; isn&amp;#x27;t technically correct. I&amp;#x27;m actually not sure what the right word is to describe languages that have lots of big compounds with no spaces. (Which is the key issue here, as to why we need subword tokenization techniques).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1810.10222/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
