HackerPapers

arXiv:1810.00393cs.LG

Deep, Skinny Neural Networks are not Universal Approximators

Jesse Johnson

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

In order to choose a neural network architecture that will be effective for a particular modeling problem, one must understand the limitations imposed by each of the potential options. These limitations are typically described in terms of information theoretic bounds, or by comparing the relative complexity needed to approximate example functions between different architectures. In this paper, we examine the topological constraints that the architecture of a neural network imposes on the level sets of all the functions that it is able to approximate. This approach is novel for both the nature of the limitations and the fact that they are independent of network depth for a broad family of activation functions.

arXiv comments
14 pages, 3 figures
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics)

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Feb 2019 to Feb 2019. Found in 1 HN submission from Feb 2019 to Feb 2019. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Here are the two papers linked towards the end of the slightly rambling article: https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.05502 https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.00393

      zazenView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.