<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Predicting the Generalization Gap in Deep Networks with Margin Distributions · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1810.00113/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1810.00113/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Predicting the Generalization Gap in Deep Networks with Margin Distributions — mentioned by choppaface</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26532945</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1810.00113:26532945</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2021 19:04:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#x27;re not ablating anything there. What happens when Train Infinity (Train 150K) doubles in size (to Train Infinity_2 -&amp;gt; 300K)? What happens when you add an unseen class? These are real-world conditions that hamper existing theoretical estimation of the generalization gap-- the &amp;quot;ideal world&amp;quot; always gets larger. In Bengio&amp;#x27;s group paper (Predicting the Generalization Gap https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.00113.pdf ) they actually do these sorts of ablations. Also, you use K (thousands) and $K$ (latex K) interchangeably; it&amp;#x27;s really hard to decipher is K is a variable or what you mean.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1810.00113/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item></channel></rss>
