<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Bohmian Trajectories for Hamiltonians with Interior-Boundary Conditions · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1809.10235/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1809.10235/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Bohmian Trajectories for Hamiltonians with Interior-Boundary Conditions — mentioned by jostylr</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43384920</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1809.10235:43384920</guid><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 03:29:54 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Bohmian mechanics is based on the idea that we perceive stuff to be in a certain position in a single reality because there is a correspondence to stuff being actually there. That&amp;#x27;s nice. If the particles are surfing a wave and not impacting it, so be it. It is also rather nice to think of the particles as just being points in space with nothing else associated with them; an electron is just an electron because the portion of the wave function that is relevant and guiding it is the electron portion; see a paper from 2004 entitled &amp;quot;Are all particles identical?&amp;quot; [1] (I am a coauthor on that).…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1809.10235/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Bohmian Trajectories for Hamiltonians with Interior-Boundary Conditions — mentioned by jostylr</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36675365</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1809.10235:36675365</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 01:24:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here are a some papers: Avoiding Ultraviolet Divergence by Means of Interior-Boundary Conditions https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.00497 This is perhaps the first of the papers and so may be a good place to start. Bohmian Trajectories for Hamiltonians with Interior-Boundary Condition https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.10235 This is the Bohmian part of the story. Multi-Time Wave Functions https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.05282 This explains the trickiness of having interactions with multi-time wave functions (space-time suggests having multi-time wave functions and no single time). Creation Rate of Dirac Particles…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1809.10235/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Bohmian Trajectories for Hamiltonians with Interior-Boundary Conditions — mentioned by jostylr</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20494056</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1809.10235:20494056</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2019 22:25:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;What EPR and Bell&amp;#x27;s arguments showed is that if you have definite results of experiments at the space-time locations where/when we think the results happened, then there has to be something non-local going on and a foliation is the simplest way to orchestrate that. So either give up a certain kind of definiteness (MW) or introduce a foliation (BM). A foliation is somewhat unpleasant, but there are ways to tease them out of the existing structures of relativity + wave function [0]. As for determinism, that is not the main point for many proponents of BM. Rather, it was about having a clear…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1809.10235/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
