<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Opinion formation dynamics -- Swift collective disillusionment triggered by unmet expectations · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1809.08939/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1809.08939/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Opinion formation dynamics -- Swift collective disillusionment triggered by unmet expectations — mentioned by jobigoud</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19064900</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1809.08939:19064900</guid><pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2019 18:59:55 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I just checked and indeed there is research. The most popular model that we all know is called the Gartner Hype Cycle. https://www.gartner.com/en/research/methodologies/gartner-hy... Arxiv has a few articles on hype cycles for example: &amp;quot;A simple interpretation of the growth of scientific/technological research impact leading to hype-type evolution curves&amp;quot;, Campani, 2014. https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8685 &amp;quot;Hype Cycle Dynamics: Microscopic Modeling and Detection&amp;quot;, Hashemi, 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.08939 You can also type &amp;quot;gartner hype cycle&amp;quot; in Scholar or sci-hub and there are many hits.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1809.08939/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>nlin.AO</category></item></channel></rss>
