https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1809.06532/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23906138urn:hackerpapers:mention:1809.06532:23906138Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:54:46 GMT<p>I got an answer from an expert. I asked: 1. How might one use nanopublications to document an assertion on a webpage? 2. Are these meant to be parsed by human readers? Who are these for and what are people supposed to do with them? The answer: (1) there&#x27;s no real difference in a nanopub that originates in a webpage or elsewhere. I think the best to do here is to document the origin of assertions in the provenance graph (through e.g. prov:wasDerivedFrom or prov:used predicates that have URL/webpage entities has objects). (2) That&#x27;s a very open question, but I&#x27;d say they&#x27;re mostly for machine…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1809.06532/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.DLhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23898400urn:hackerpapers:mention:1809.06532:23898400Mon, 20 Jul 2020 14:53:14 GMT<p>The comment is now deleted, but someone asked for some examples on nanopublications. I just found out about nanopublications myself, but here is what I found: - The website itself [1]. - This paper from 2018 has an example (and it shows some broader scientific context about this idea) [2]. [1] http://nanopub.org/wordpress/?page_id=8 [2] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.06532.pdf</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1809.06532/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.DL