<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>From Möbius inversion to renormalisation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1809.00941/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1809.00941/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>From Möbius inversion to renormalisation — mentioned by abelaer</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42970534</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1809.00941:42970534</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 08:13:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#x27;s right! This is secretly about doing calculus on posets. You can actually generalise some notions from incidence algebras to other settings, like groupoids and categories, where you can play the same games. This is something I mostly haven&amp;#x27;t looked at yet, but I think it might be fun, and some people seem to have found it useful (for example: https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.00941 and https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.06662)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1809.00941/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
