<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Discovery of the Luminous, Decades-Long, Extragalactic Radio Transient FIRST J141918.9+394036 · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1808.08964/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1808.08964/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Discovery of the Luminous, Decades-Long, Extragalactic Radio Transient FIRST J141918.9+394036 — mentioned by _fmhg</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18177852</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1808.08964:18177852</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 17:18:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Science Daily altered one sentence from the originally regurgitated PR, and I think it thoughtlessly corrupted its entire meaning. SD: &amp;quot;The blast generates two jets of gamma rays which travel out...&amp;quot; PR: &amp;quot;The blast generates two jets which travel out ... The jets emit gamma rays,...&amp;quot; Implication from their creative edit is that the blast itself shot out gamma rays (photons) at light speed, whereas the paper&amp;#x27;s authors actually described something else, a decades-long process of ejecta compressing and interacting to create gamma emissions. &amp;quot;The long time baseline of this event offers the best…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1808.08964/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.HE</category></item></channel></rss>
