<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quantum Motion on Shape Space and the Gauge Dependent Emergence of Dynamics and Probability in Absolute Space and Time · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1808.06844/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1808.06844/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quantum Motion on Shape Space and the Gauge Dependent Emergence of Dynamics and Probability in Absolute Space and Time — mentioned by jostylr</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20497447</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1808.06844:20497447</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:45:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, that article is what I meant. I read the article you cited. While enjoyable, it does not make its case for me. It very much feels like presuming the wrong ideas of what a particle theory is. --- First, double slit. Points on the screen, wave pattern built up. The natural conclusion is a wave guiding a particle. That&amp;#x27;s what BM gives. BM does not deny the existence of the wave function. Rather, it gives it a reason for being. The article talks about viewing the wave function collapse as a ballon hitting a needle and popping. But it doesn&amp;#x27;t really explain why a world full of waves should…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1808.06844/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
