Repeated noise pattern in the data of arXiv:1807.08572, "Evidence for Superconductivity at Ambient Temperature and Pressure in Nanostructures" — mentioned by olliej

Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:10:30 GMT

Hasn’t this report already been debunked or is it a different one? (Edit: it is, and it shows evidence of data duplication and manipulation: https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.02929)

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Repeated noise pattern in the data of arXiv:1807.08572, "Evidence for Superconductivity at Ambient Temperature and Pressure in Nanostructures" — mentioned by _Microft

Mon, 13 Aug 2018 20:06:26 GMT

The comment by Brian Skinner who discovered the correlated noise in a graph is available on Arxiv [1]. It's not claiming fraud but points out that such an effect of correlated noise below a threshold temperature between seemingly independent measurements has not been observed before. Quit-your-bullshit played safe ;) [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.02929.pdf

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Repeated noise pattern in the data of arXiv:1807.08572, "Evidence for Superconductivity at Ambient Temperature and Pressure in Nanostructures" · HackerPapers discussions

Repeated noise pattern in the data of arXiv:1807.08572, "Evidence for Superconductivity at Ambient Temperature and Pressure in Nanostructures" — mentioned by olliej

Repeated noise pattern in the data of arXiv:1807.08572, "Evidence for Superconductivity at Ambient Temperature and Pressure in Nanostructures" — mentioned by _Microft