<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Conway knot is not slice · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1808.02923/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1808.02923/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Conway knot is not slice — mentioned by pmiller2</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23238627</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1808.02923:23238627</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 18:52:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Link to paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.02923 I have not read the paper, but I have skimmed it briefly, and it looks pretty exciting. This isn&amp;#x27;t a case of &amp;quot;here&amp;#x27;s a new invariant, and, oh, BTW, it works to show the Conway knot isn&amp;#x27;t slice.&amp;quot; It&amp;#x27;s an actual new technique. And, at first glance, it looks like a pretty simple technique. I didn&amp;#x27;t immediately see anything here that wasn&amp;#x27;t just a neat combination of low dimensional topology and basic knot theory techniques. I&amp;#x27;d be interested to see what this technique could do with knots having more than 12 crossings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1808.02923/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.GT</category></item></channel></rss>
