Apparent evidence for Hawking points in the CMB Sky · HackerPapers discussions

Apparent evidence for Hawking points in the CMB Sky — mentioned by dguest

Mon, 10 Apr 2023 17:04:15 GMT

Link to paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.01740

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Apparent evidence for Hawking points in the CMB Sky — mentioned by tsimionescu

Sat, 27 Aug 2022 15:25:55 GMT

> I’d be surprised if either scientists were trying to publish articles like that — or if they were, that they could pass peer review. The article we're discussing itself even links to one such paper [0]. All of the others she mentions are also published works - Penrose's CCC [1], the ekpyrotic universe [2], Hawking's no-boundary state [3] etc. > On the other hand, if you are working on theories that can extend into the early universe, it’s not unimportant to try and figure out where the model breaks down. Maybe t=0 isn’t possible, but t=1s? 1ns? 1ps? How much can we feasibly describe? Sure…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Apparent evidence for Hawking points in the CMB Sky — mentioned by KingFelix

Wed, 07 Oct 2020 19:54:04 GMT

Here is a which was updated in March, not sure if that is the final update or not - arxiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.01740

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Apparent evidence for Hawking points in the CMB Sky — mentioned by sorokod

Wed, 07 Oct 2020 19:20:10 GMT

https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.01740

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Apparent evidence for Hawking points in the CMB Sky — mentioned by godelmachine

Sat, 26 Jan 2019 22:19:11 GMT

Looks like much of what you are saying comes directly from this - https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.01740

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Apparent evidence for Hawking points in the CMB Sky — mentioned by yoquan

Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:00:01 GMT

Penrose'paper is here: https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.01740

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Apparent evidence for Hawking points in the CMB Sky — HN submission

Sat, 01 Sep 2018 16:59:47 GMT

Apparent Evidence for Hawking Points in the CMB Sky

71 points; 20 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Apparent evidence for Hawking points in the CMB Sky — mentioned by ChuckMcM

Thu, 23 Aug 2018 20:09:35 GMT

Here is the paper link: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.01740.pdf It's fairly short. But it proposes a really interesting question. What happens at the heat death of the universe? If it ends up as a bunch of black holes slowly evaporating from Hawking radiation you're left with just photons and gravitons. And then if that is what happen, did it happen before the big bang and so could we see evidence of it in the cosmic background radiation. (Sort of a peek at the initial conditions for a very complex differential equation). The result through a bit of hand waving seems to be perhaps. Clearly more…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.