<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Wada structures in a binary black hole system · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1807.10741/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1807.10741/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Wada structures in a binary black hole system — mentioned by nyrikki</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43007120</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1807.10741:43007120</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:13:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Quantum superposition is indecomposable, measurement is an artifact of the Copenhagen interpretation. You can view wave function collapse as invalidating your priors and it still works without observation. The special case of quantum superposition being indecomposable function, or one you can&amp;#x27;t Curry if you prefer. QM is actually lucky that there are only two exit basins, n≥3 is where you get the stronger form of indeterminism. Classic Chaos is deterministic with inf precision, but riddled basins require absolute precision which is stronger, and the wada property is still not deterministic…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1807.10741/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
