<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Semi-convolutional Operators for Instance Segmentation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1807.10712/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1807.10712/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Semi-convolutional Operators for Instance Segmentation — mentioned by nmca</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17739290</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1807.10712:17739290</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2018 11:40:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Hm, this seems vaguely interesting-if-true but: 1) It&amp;#x27;s not published in a good CV journal. 2) It seems quite likely that they&amp;#x27;ve just identified the problems described and fixed by [0, 1] (of which [0] is the much better paper). In brief, CNNs guarantee translation invariance (ignoring boundary effects) through translation equivariance of their feature maps; this borks certain problems, most importantly a commonly used mechanism for instance segmentation as described in [0]. Consider trying to instance-segment two copy/pasted faces; translation equivariance and global pooling clearly make it…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1807.10712/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
