<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Do quantum propositions obey the principle of excluded middle? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1807.10127/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1807.10127/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Do quantum propositions obey the principle of excluded middle? — mentioned by syki</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29781185</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1807.10127:29781185</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 14:40:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Statisticians have a saying, “all models are wrong, some are useful”. What we have is that math is useful for modeling physics. But it is just that, a model in so far as we know. Believing that math or logic is intrinsic to the universe is not all necessary to using math and logic for modeling physical phenomena. There are quite a few physicists and mathematicians who don’t believe math is an intrinsic part of the universe. It’s not at all clear that the Law of the Excluded Middle is an intrinsic part of the universe. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.10127…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1807.10127/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
