<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>LQ-Nets: Learned Quantization for Highly Accurate and Compact Deep Neural Networks · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1807.10029/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1807.10029/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>LQ-Nets: Learned Quantization for Highly Accurate and Compact Deep Neural Networks — mentioned by p1esk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17759284</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1807.10029:17759284</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 16:21:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;NN quantization has been an area of active research in the last 3 years, but it&amp;#x27;s not trivial when going to 4 bits or below. Usually to achieve good accuracy during inference, a model needs to be trained or finetuned at low precision. The simple post training conversion usually won&amp;#x27;t work (it does not always work even at 8 bits). Models that are already efficient (e.g. MobileNet) are harder to quantize than fat, overparameterized models such as AlexNet or VGG. Increasing a model size (number of neurons or filters) helps, but obviously it offsets the gains in efficiency to some degree.…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1807.10029/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
