<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Motivating the Rules of the Game for Adversarial Example Research · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1807.06732/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1807.06732/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Motivating the Rules of the Game for Adversarial Example Research — mentioned by igorkraw</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29385304</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1807.06732:29385304</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 21:08:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I work in this field, I have a project specifically on adversarial examples and I have a strong opinion on this. I personally think worrying about adversarial examples in real life production systems is like worrying about getting the vanilla linux kernel to perform RT critical tasks. It is fundamentally not a burden you should put on that one component alone and is a problem you can only solve with a system approach. And if you do that, it is for all practical purposes already solved: apply multiple, random perturbations to the input, project your perturbed version onto a known,safe image…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1807.06732/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Motivating the Rules of the Game for Adversarial Example Research — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17682068</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1807.06732:17682068</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 18:06:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Motivating the Rules of the Game for Adversarial Example Research&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1807.06732/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
