HackerPapers

arXiv:1807.02059astro-ph.HE

Testing the universality of free fall by tracking a pulsar in a stellar triple system

Anne M. Archibald, Nina V. Gusinskaia, Jason W. T. Hessels, Adam T. Deller, David L. Kaplan, Duncan R. Lorimer, Ryan S. Lynch, Scott M. Ransom, Ingrid H. Stairs

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Einstein's theory of gravity, general relativity, has passed stringent tests in laboratories, elsewhere in the Solar Sytem, and in pulsar binaries. Nevertheless it is known to be incompatible with quantum mechanics and must differ from the true behaviour of matter in strong fields and at small spatial scales. A key aspect of general relativity to test is the strong equivalence principle (SEP), which states that all freely falling objects, regardless of how strong their gravity, experience the same acceleration in the same gravitational field. Essentially all alternatives to general relativity violate this principle at some level. Previous direct tests of the SEP are limited by the weak gravity of the bodies in the Earth-Moon-Sun system or by the weak gravitational pull of the Galaxy on pulsar-white dwarf binaries. PSR~J0337+1715 is a hierarchical stellar triple system, where the inner binary consists of a millisecond radio pulsar in a $1.6$-day orbit with a white dwarf. This inner binary is in a $327$-day orbit with another white dwarf. In this system, the pulsar and the inner companion fall toward the outer companion with an acceleration about $10^8$ times greater than that produced by falling in the Galactic potential, and the pulsar's gravitational binding energy is roughly $10\%$ of its mass. Here we report that in spite of the pulsar's strong gravity, the accelerations experienced by it and the inner white dwarf differ by a fraction of no more than $2.6\times 10^{-6}$ ($95\%$ confidence level). We can roughly compare this to other SEP tests by using the strong-field Nordtvedt parameter $\hatη_N$. Our limit on $\hatη_N$ is a factor of ten smaller than that obtained from (weak-field) Solar-System SEP tests and a factor of almost a thousand smaller than that obtained from other strong-field SEP tests.

arXiv comments
This is the pre-refereeing version as required by Nature's rules
Journal reference
Nature volume 559, pages 73--76 (2018)
DOI
doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0265-1
Subjects
astro-ph.HEHigh Energy Astrophysical Phenomena gr-qcGeneral Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 3 comments across 3 threads, from Aug 2021 to Apr 2023.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments3 threads

    • Some reading on the universality of free fall version of the strong equivalent principle, tested in a manifestly relativistic regime: "Even Phenomenally Dense Neutron Stars Fall like a Feather -- Einstein Gets It Right Again" https://public.nrao.edu/news/neutron-stars-fall/ More…

      raattgiftView on HNParent context

    • This is a surprisingly good write-up. The Skordis & Zlosnik paper can be found at https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.00082 I'll start with some comments for non-experts, and then escalate about ten paragraphs further down. tl;dr: there are lots of things that hang on General Relativity…

      raattgiftView on HNParent context

    • Pretty sure you know this, but for the benefit of other readers, extracting from the SEP we might more properly put this as, "no-one can tell the difference between uniform acceleration and being at rest while immersed in a uniform gravitational field". A uniform gravitational…

      raattgiftView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.