arXiv:1807.01622cs.LG
Neural Processes
Abstract
A neural network (NN) is a parameterised function that can be tuned via gradient descent to approximate a labelled collection of data with high precision. A Gaussian process (GP), on the other hand, is a probabilistic model that defines a distribution over possible functions, and is updated in light of data via the rules of probabilistic inference. GPs are probabilistic, data-efficient and flexible, however they are also computationally intensive and thus limited in their applicability. We introduce a class of neural latent variable models which we call Neural Processes (NPs), combining the best of both worlds. Like GPs, NPs define distributions over functions, are capable of rapid adaptation to new observations, and can estimate the uncertainty in their predictions. Like NNs, NPs are computationally efficient during training and evaluation but also learn to adapt their priors to data. We demonstrate the performance of NPs on a range of learning tasks, including regression and optimisation, and compare and contrast with related models in the literature.
I consider GPs in two ways: hyperparameter optimization (where GPs are a specific instantiation of bayesian optimization) and a powerful non-linear regression method that supports uncertainty via the rich posterior distributions you get with GPs. However, on the side of…
mxwsnView on HNParent context
It's the opposite, they are very data efficient (compared to neural networks). Also, they are a bayesian method and give some mathematical guarantees. They are computationally expensive though. You can use them in neural nets to do few shot learning [0]. [0]…
317070View on HNParent context