<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Stochastic natural gradient descent draws posterior samples in function space · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1806.09597/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1806.09597/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Stochastic natural gradient descent draws posterior samples in function space — mentioned by duckworthd</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18638975</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1806.09597:18638975</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2018 02:59:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;My $0.02. I&amp;#x27;ve been using JAX for a while now. A paper I&amp;#x27;m an author on (https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09597, a follow-up to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18633215) resulted in an algorithm that required taking second-derivatives on a per-example basis. This is extremely difficult in TensorFlow, but with JAX it was a 2-liner. Even better, it&amp;#x27;s _super_ fast, thanks to XLA&amp;#x27;s compile-to-GPU and JAX&amp;#x27;s auto-batching mechanics. I highly recommend JAX to power users. It&amp;#x27;s nowhere near as feature-complete from a neural network sense as, say, PyTorch, but it is very good at what it does, and its…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1806.09597/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
