HackerPapers

arXiv:1806.07552cs.AI

Interpretable to Whom? A Role-based Model for Analyzing Interpretable Machine Learning Systems

Richard Tomsett, Dave Braines, Dan Harborne, Alun Preece, Supriyo Chakraborty

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Several researchers have argued that a machine learning system's interpretability should be defined in relation to a specific agent or task: we should not ask if the system is interpretable, but to whom is it interpretable. We describe a model intended to help answer this question, by identifying different roles that agents can fulfill in relation to the machine learning system. We illustrate the use of our model in a variety of scenarios, exploring how an agent's role influences its goals, and the implications for defining interpretability. Finally, we make suggestions for how our model could be useful to interpretability researchers, system developers, and regulatory bodies auditing machine learning systems.

arXiv comments
presented at 2018 ICML Workshop on Human Interpretability in Machine Learning (WHI 2018), Stockholm, Sweden
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jan 2020 to Jan 2020.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • This is a great point. There is a general lack of understanding about what it means for models to be interpretable & explainable. These words get thrown around often by people who don't understand the definition, and also the trade off with accuracy. Some papers i found…

      1_over_nView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.