<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>SoK: Sanitizing for Security · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1806.04355/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1806.04355/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>SoK: Sanitizing for Security — mentioned by stensal</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18902672</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1806.04355:18902672</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 13:12:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I want to avoid to do comparison with the said X tool without fully understanding their constraints because different approaches have made different design trade off and each has its own strength. That having been said, the academia often publish some survey papers about the state of art of memory error detection tools. There is a recent paper &amp;quot;SoK: Sanitizing for Security&amp;quot;(https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.04355) that has categorized most of the known dynamic memory error finding tools very well. They analyzed the different detection mechanisms and collected empirical data with their best efforts…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1806.04355/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>SoK: Sanitizing for Security — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17336172</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1806.04355:17336172</guid><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 05:35:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;SoK: Sanitizing for Security&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1806.04355/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>SoK: Sanitizing for Security — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17306338</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1806.04355:17306338</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 19:46:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Sanitizing for Security&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1806.04355/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
