<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Pushing the Limits of Monte Carlo Simulations for the 3d Ising Model · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1806.03558/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1806.03558/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Pushing the Limits of Monte Carlo Simulations for the 3d Ising Model — mentioned by aksskfngt</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24837028</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1806.03558:24837028</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:30:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is interesting. By the way, it is noticeable that Ferrenberg himself did not find anything wrong with MT in one of his latest papers. He however mostly used MRG32k3a, and checked that MT gave similar numbers. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.03558&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1806.03558/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.comp-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
