HackerPapers

arXiv:1806.03208stat.AP

Prediction of the FIFA World Cup 2018 - A random forest approach with an emphasis on estimated team ability parameters

Andreas Groll, Christophe Ley, Gunther Schauberger, Hans Van Eetvelde

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

In this work, we compare three different modeling approaches for the scores of soccer matches with regard to their predictive performances based on all matches from the four previous FIFA World Cups 2002 - 2014: Poisson regression models, random forests and ranking methods. While the former two are based on the teams' covariate information, the latter method estimates adequate ability parameters that reflect the current strength of the teams best. Within this comparison the best-performing prediction methods on the training data turn out to be the ranking methods and the random forests. However, we show that by combining the random forest with the team ability parameters from the ranking methods as an additional covariate we can improve the predictive power substantially. Finally, this combination of methods is chosen as the final model and based on its estimates, the FIFA World Cup 2018 is simulated repeatedly and winning probabilities are obtained for all teams. The model slightly favors Spain before the defending champion Germany. Additionally, we provide survival probabilities for all teams and at all tournament stages as well as the most probable tournament outcome.

arXiv comments
First revised version, corrected typo in introduction when referring to the winning probabilities derived by Zeileis, Leitner, and Hornik (2018), which are for Germany 15.8% instead of 12.8%. Second revised version, slight changes in notation in Section 3.3
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
stat.APApplications (Statistics)

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Jun 2018 to Jun 2018. Found in 1 HN submission from Jun 2018 to Jun 2018. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • The research paper this article is based on: https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03208 Other posts of the same article: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17310365 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17309996 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17305632 Can they be combined?

      nanisView on HNParent context

    • This is the actual research: https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03208 At the very least, the title of this post should have "makes a prediction" rather than "predicts". The future has not happened yet. Once it does, we will know whether this particular prediction was correct. That is…

      nanisView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.