<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Deployment of a Blockchain-Based Self-Sovereign Identity · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1806.01926/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1806.01926/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Deployment of a Blockchain-Based Self-Sovereign Identity — mentioned by throwaway83342</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18231576</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1806.01926:18231576</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:00:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You might want to read a bit through this 4 year old thread about Tribler: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8780313. Apart from the mountains of grant money and severly broken crypto (&amp;quot;set aside &amp;#x27;RSA without blinding&amp;#x27;; this is RSA without padding.&amp;quot;) which might or might not be fixed by now, I think the main point is that: &amp;quot;Tribler has a very long history of making high profile claims and never being able to follow through with actually usable software&amp;quot;. And it seems they&amp;#x27;re doing it again, now even making clearly false claims. See this paper, published this summer…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1806.01926/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item></channel></rss>
