HackerPapers

arXiv:1806.00574hep-ex

Fuel-composition dependent reactor antineutrino yield at RENO

The RENO Collaboration

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We report a fuel-dependent reactor electron antineutrino ($\overlineν_e$) yield using six 2.8 GW$_{\text{th}}$ reactors in the Hanbit nuclear power plant complex, Yonggwang, Korea. The analysis uses $850\,666$ $\overlineν_e$ candidate events with a background fraction of 2.0 % acquired through inverse beta decay (IBD) interactions in the near detector for 1807.9 live days from August 2011 to February 2018. Based on multiple fuel cycles, we observe a fuel $^{235}$U dependent variation of measured IBD yields with a slope of $(1.51 \pm 0.23) \times 10^{-43} $cm$^2$/fission and measure a total average IBD yield of $(5.84 \pm 0.13) \times 10^{-43} $cm$^2$/fission. The hypothesis of no fuel-dependent IBD yield is ruled out at 6.6 $σ$. The observed IBD yield variation over $^{235}$U isotope fraction does not show significant deviation from the Huber-Mueller (HM) prediction at 1.3 $σ$. The measured fuel-dependent variation determines IBD yields of $(6.15 \pm 0.19) \times 10^{-43} $cm$^2$/fission and $(4.18\pm 0.26) \times 10^{-43} $cm$^2$/fission for two dominant fuel isotopes $^{235}$U and $^{239}$Pu, respectively. The measured IBD yield per $^{235}$U fission shows the largest deficit relative to the HM prediction. Reevaluation of the $^{235}$U IBD yield per fission may mostly solve the Reactor Antineutrino Anomaly (RAA) while $^{239}$Pu is not completely ruled out as a possible contributor of the anomaly. We also report a 2.9 $σ$ correlation between the fractional change of the 5 MeV excess and the reactor fuel isotope fraction of $^{235}$U.

arXiv comments
6 pages and 5 figures, v4 note: (1) data files for figure 1, figure 2, figure 5 are included for arXiv users (2) minor modifications in abstract and main text for clarification
Journal reference
Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 232501 (2019)
DOI
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.232501
Subjects
hep-exHigh Energy Physics, Experiment

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jun 2018 to Jun 2018.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • On reactor antineutrino anomaly, what do you think of https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.00574 ? It seems to me both Daya Bay collaboration and RENO collaboration suggest anomaly is explained by nuclear fuel evolution.

      sanxiynView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.