<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Observation of Higgs boson production in association with a top quark pair at the LHC with the ATLAS detector · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1806.00425/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1806.00425/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Observation of Higgs boson production in association with a top quark pair at the LHC with the ATLAS detector — mentioned by chikei</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18531980</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1806.00425:18531980</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 08:45:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, it&amp;#x27;s common for large scale collaboration experiment like this. Papers from ATLAS/CMS have about 15 pages for authors (for example https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.00425.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.02610.pdf).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1806.00425/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ex</category></item><item><title>Observation of Higgs boson production in association with a top quark pair at the LHC with the ATLAS detector — mentioned by dguest</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17587994</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1806.00425:17587994</guid><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2018 18:11:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;As others have commented we&amp;#x27;ve been using tools like neural networks and boosted decisions trees for a long time. We have quite good simulation which tells us what particles would look like in our detector, but one thing our simulation tells us is that it&amp;#x27;s often really hard to tell the difference between a Higgs Boson and some other &amp;quot;background&amp;quot; process. So the logic goes like this: if we trust our simulation, we can simulate the Higgs, and simulate the background, and then train a neural network to tell us which is which. Then we turn the network loose on our data. If it sees lots of things…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1806.00425/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ex</category></item></channel></rss>
