<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Rotation Equivariance and Invariance in Convolutional Neural Networks · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.12301/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.12301/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Rotation Equivariance and Invariance in Convolutional Neural Networks — mentioned by improbable22</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18041777</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1805.12301:18041777</guid><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:45:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There is work on rotationally invariant networks, e.g. for identifying galaxies, or cells under a microscope. For example: https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.04642 https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.12301 I haven&amp;#x27;t looked closely enough to be sure if they literally had complex activations, but this seems like an obvious use. Maybe they would have, if only tensorflow made it easy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.12301/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item></channel></rss>
