HackerPapers

arXiv:1805.12028hep-ex

Significant Excess of ElectronLike Events in the MiniBooNE Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiment

MiniBooNE Collaboration, A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo, B. C. Brown, L. Bugel, G. Cheng, J. M. Conrad, R. L. Cooper, R. Dharmapalan, A. Diaz, Z. Djurcic, D. A. Finley, R. Ford, F. G. Garcia, G. T. Garvey, J. Grange, E. -C. Huang, W. Huelsnitz, C. Ignarra, R. A. Johnson, G. Karagiorgi, T. Katori, T. Kobilarcik, W. C. Louis, C. Mariani, W. Marsh, G. B. Mills, J. Mirabal, J. Monroe, C. D. Moore, J. Mousseau, P. Nienaber, J. Nowak, B. Osmanov, Z. Pavlovic, D. Perevalov, H. Ray, B. P. Roe, A. D. Russell, M. H. Shaevitz, J. Spitz, I. Stancu, R. Tayloe, R. T. Thornton, M. Tzanov, R. G. Van de Water, D. H. White, D. A. Wickremasinghe, E. D. Zimmerman

Abstract

The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of $ν_e$ appearance data from $12.84 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in neutrino mode, an increase of approximately a factor of two over previously reported results. A $ν_e$ charged-current quasielastic event excess of $381.2 \pm 85.2$ events ($4.5 σ$) is observed in the energy range $200<E_ν^{QE}<1250$~MeV. Combining these data with the $\bar ν_e$ appearance data from $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in antineutrino mode, a total $ν_e$ plus $\bar ν_e$ charged-current quasielastic event excess of $460.5 \pm 99.0$ events ($4.7 σ$) is observed. If interpreted in a two-neutrino oscillation model, $ν_μ \rightarrow ν_e$, the best oscillation fit to the excess has a probability of $21.1\%$, while the background-only fit has a $χ^2$ probability of $6 \times 10^{-7}$ relative to the best fit. The MiniBooNE data are consistent in energy and magnitude with the excess of events reported by the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND), and the significance of the combined LSND and MiniBooNE excesses is $6.0 σ$. A two-neutrino oscillation interpretation of the data would require at least four neutrino types and indicate physics beyond the three neutrino paradigm.Although the data are fit with a two-neutrino oscillation model, other models may provide better fits to the data.

arXiv comments
Improved some of the figures and improved the correlation between neutrino and antineutrino data
Journal reference
Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 221801 (2018)
DOI
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.221801
Subjects
hep-exHigh Energy Physics, Experiment hep-phHigh Energy Physics, Phenomenology

On Hacker News

Linked by 3 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 3 threads, from Jun 2018 to Jun 2018. Found in 1 HN submission from Jun 2018 to Jun 2018. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments3 threads

    • Given the publication dates, those other articles are almost certainly also based on https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.12028, which incorporates those two additional years of data.

      yorwbaView on HNParent context

    • It's definitely possible, but I just want to point out for other readers that it's not like the collaborators haven't thought about this stuff. Quoting from the article at https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.12028 > Nuclear effects associated with neutrino interactions on carbon can…

      twtwView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.