<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Succinct data structure for dynamic trees with faster queries · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.11255/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.11255/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Succinct data structure for dynamic trees with faster queries — mentioned by qazxcvbnm</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43283971</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1805.11255:43283971</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 19:10:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Note that succinct data structures may not be faster than conventional structures if your dataset fits in memory http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~huanche1/slides/FST.pdf . Of course, for large datasets where storage access times dominate, succinct data structures win all around. In any case, succinct trees are works of art (If I recall https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.11255 was a good exposition) (just look at how that RMQ works)!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.11255/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DS</category></item></channel></rss>
