<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Scalable Methods for 8-bit Training of Neural Networks · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.11046/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.11046/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Scalable Methods for 8-bit Training of Neural Networks — mentioned by CuriouslyC</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35037181</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1805.11046:35037181</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 03:23:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It can go farther than that, it seems like the weight gradients are the main thing where the precision is a bottleneck (see https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.11046).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.11046/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Scalable Methods for 8-bit Training of Neural Networks — mentioned by p1esk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19864054</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1805.11046:19864054</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 23:46:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the detailed answer. I think your main point is that memory bandwidth would prevent the performance speedup. Are V100s memory bound when executing F16 ops on tensor cores? Second, do we really need dedicated FP32 cores for DL? Tensor cores accumulate in FP32 (is that what you meant when you said they did a significant amount of FP32 compute?), and recent papers indicate we’re moving towards 8 bit training [1]. Besides, do TPUs use dedicated FP32 hw? Finally, if the memory bandwidth is indeed the bottleneck, perhaps all that die area from FP32 and especially FP64 cores could be…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.11046/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
