<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Contact-Aided Invariant Extended Kalman Filtering for Legged Robot State Estimation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.10410/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.10410/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Contact-Aided Invariant Extended Kalman Filtering for Legged Robot State Estimation — mentioned by goldbattle</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28293673</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1805.10410:28293673</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:26:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;My understanding is is that group invariance is just another perspective to look at the original non-linear system transformations as compared to the more traditional &amp;quot;on-manifold&amp;quot;. Really it seems like an easier way to derive a system which the observable properties of the system are well defined as compared to worrying about ensuring observability (and unobservability) properties hold through the non-linear linearization process. There are quite a few groups that use &amp;quot;invariant filters&amp;quot; in robotics (eg [1]), but I always wonder if this could not be addressed through more traditional means…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.10410/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.RO</category></item></channel></rss>
