arXiv:1805.04908cs.LG
On the Practical Computational Power of Finite Precision RNNs for Language Recognition
Abstract
While Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) are famously known to be Turing complete, this relies on infinite precision in the states and unbounded computation time. We consider the case of RNNs with finite precision whose computation time is linear in the input length. Under these limitations, we show that different RNN variants have different computational power. In particular, we show that the LSTM and the Elman-RNN with ReLU activation are strictly stronger than the RNN with a squashing activation and the GRU. This is achieved because LSTMs and ReLU-RNNs can easily implement counting behavior. We show empirically that the LSTM does indeed learn to effectively use the counting mechanism.
Neural nets can still not solve aⁿbⁿ. This is the latest attempt of which I'm aware: On the Practical Computational Power of Finite Precision RNNs for Language Recognition https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.04908 Typically, it claims generalisation but fails to demonstrate it. As we…
YeGoblynQueenneView on HNParent context