<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Measuring Scientific Broadness · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.04647/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.04647/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Measuring Scientific Broadness — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36137903</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1805.04647:36137903</guid><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 13:05:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; compare the topics of her papers with the topics of her videos I did that but did not say so explicitly: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; opinions on matters in which they have little or no expertise especially when the opinions are delivered with excessive confidence and/or without nuance. I take your point that some apparent &amp;gt; stir the controversy videos particularly in the last year &amp;lt;https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLwgQsqtH9H5c4IXKj82g-...&amp;gt; at least support the notion that some of the point of her YouTube enterprise is to focus on in-the-news topics far from her own academic publication record. For those…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.04647/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.soc-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
