<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Real and imaginary energy gaps: a comparison between single excitation Superradiance and Superconductivity and robustness to disorder · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.03153/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.03153/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Real and imaginary energy gaps: a comparison between single excitation Superradiance and Superconductivity and robustness to disorder — mentioned by slwvx</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44665632</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1805.03153:44665632</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:42:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The ideas of superradiance [1] and superabsorption [2] in the article were new to me. The article [3] compares superradiance to superconductivity, but it&amp;#x27;s not clear if superradiance is as useful of a property as superconductivity. Now I&amp;#x27;m wondering what other sorts of super-xxxx effects are possible via quantum properties. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superradiance [2] https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms5705 [3] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.03153&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.03153/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.supr-con</category></item></channel></rss>
