<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Non-thermal pressure support in X-COP galaxy clusters · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.00034/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.00034/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Non-thermal pressure support in X-COP galaxy clusters — mentioned by xioxox</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22032929</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1805.00034:22032929</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 09:03:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks! The motions detected are pretty subsonic, so probably aren&amp;#x27;t expected to affect the hydrostatic equilibrium assumption significantly. We&amp;#x27;re measuring bulk flows, however, and not the turbulent width. There are some other recent observational results suggesting that the hydrostatic assumption isn&amp;#x27;t too bad: https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.00034 Yes - there was a lot of work behind this paper, and most of it was on trying to get the calibration procedures we developed to work. It was a long process of trying things and seeing what worked and testing the results for consistency. Initially I…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1805.00034/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
