HackerPapers

arXiv:1804.11348astro-ph.GA

Evidence for an Intermediate-Mass Milky Way from Gaia DR2 Halo Globular Cluster Motions

Laura L. Watkins, Roeland P. van der Marel, Sangmo Tony Sohn, N. Wyn Evans

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We estimate the mass of the Milky Way (MW) within 21.1 kpc using the kinematics of halo globular clusters (GCs) determined by Gaia. The second Gaia data release (DR2) contained a catalogue of absolute proper motions (PMs) for a set of Galactic GCs and satellite galaxies measured using Gaia DR2 data. We select from the catalogue only halo GCs, identifying a total of 34 GCs spanning $2.0 < r < 21.1$ kpc, and use their 3D kinematics to estimate the anisotropy over this range to be $β= 0.46^{+0.15}_{-0.19}$, in good agreement, though slightly lower than, a recent estimate for a sample of halo GCs using HST PM measurements further out in the halo. We then use the Gaia kinematics to estimate the mass of the MW inside the outermost GC to be $M(< 21.1 \mathrm{kpc}) = 0.21^{+0.04}_{-0.03} 10^{12} \mathrm{M_\odot}$, which corresponds to a circular velocity of $v_\mathrm{circ}(21.1 \mathrm{kpc}) = 206^{+19}_{-16}$ km/s. The implied virial mass is $M_\mathrm{virial} = 1.28^{+0.97}_{-0.48} 10^{12} \mathrm{M_\odot}$. The error bars encompass the uncertainties on the anisotropy and on the density profile of the MW dark halo, and the scatter inherent in the mass estimator we use. We get improved estimates when we combine the Gaia and HST samples to provide kinematics for 46 GCs out to 39.5 kpc: $β= 0.52^{+0.11}_{-0.14}$, $M(< 39.5 \mathrm{kpc}) = 0.42^{+0.07}_{-0.06} 10^{12} \mathrm{M_\odot}$, and $M_\mathrm{virial} = 1.54^{+0.75}_{-0.44} 10^{12} \mathrm{M_\odot}$. We show that these results are robust to potential substructure in the halo GC distribution. While a wide range of MW virial masses have been advocated in the literature, from below $10^{12} \mathrm{M_\odot}$ to above $2 \times 10^{12}\mathrm{M_\odot}$, these new data imply that an intermediate mass is most likely.

arXiv comments
16 pages, 9 figures, 3 tables, accepted for publication in ApJ (updated to match accepted version)
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab089f
Subjects
astro-ph.GAAstrophysics of Galaxies

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Oct 2023 to Oct 2023. Found in 1 HN submission from Mar 2019 to Mar 2019. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • The Arxiv[0] paper abstract seems much clearer and more informative than the linked article. In particular, it points to WHY the mass has been revised down so far -- there's seemingly a lot less mass at 19+ kiloparsecs (about 62,000 lightyears) from galactic center than we…

      ccooffeeView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.