https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1804.08642/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39754418urn:hackerpapers:mention:1804.08642:39754418Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:38:18 GMT<p>Not a physicist, just a fan. It’s not just coffee and blackboards and hoarded Japanese chalk: the goalpost slalom around supersymmetry drives discussions about what colliders to build and how to operate them [1]. Before scalar field excitation at 125 GeV it was predicted by many that the power and luminosity of that run would show weak bosonic superpartners in the first run. With Higgs at 125 GeV it gets really tortured as an argument. This is also the subtext with the really aggressive public branding of “dark matter”, when it should really be called something like “large scale apparent…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1804.08642/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>hep-phhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17863348urn:hackerpapers:submission:1804.08642:17863348Tue, 28 Aug 2018 22:05:39 GMT<p>Supersymmetry at a 28 TeV hadron collider: HE-LHC</p><p></p><p>4 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1804.08642/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>hep-ph